Monday, August 27, 2018

Week of August 27, 2018


Astronomy

Kepler's Three Laws

In the early 1600s, Johannes Kepler proposed three laws of planetary motion. Kepler was able to summarize the carefully collected data of his mentor - Tycho Brahe - with three statements that described the motion of planets in a sun-centered solar system. Kepler's efforts to explain the underlying reasons for such motions are no longer accepted; nonetheless, the actual laws themselves are still considered an accurate description of the motion of any planet and any satellite.
Kepler's three laws of planetary motion can be described as follows:
  • The path of the planets about the sun is elliptical in shape, with the center of the sun being located at one focus. (The Law of Ellipses)
  • An imaginary line drawn from the center of the sun to the center of the planet will sweep out equal areas in equal intervals of time. (The Law of Equal Areas)
  • The ratio of the squares of the periods of any two planets is equal to the ratio of the cubes of their average distances from the sun. (The Law of Harmonies)

 

The Law of Ellipses

Kepler's first law - sometimes referred to as the law of ellipses - explains that planets are orbiting the sun in a path described as an ellipse. An ellipse can easily be constructed using a pencil, two tacks, a string, a sheet of paper and a piece of cardboard. Tack the sheet of paper to the cardboard using the two tacks. Then tie the string into a loop and wrap the loop around the two tacks. Take your pencil and pull the string until the pencil and two tacks make a triangle (see diagram at the right). Then begin to trace out a path with the pencil, keeping the string wrapped tightly around the tacks. The resulting shape will be an ellipse. An ellipse is a special curve in which the sum of the distances from every point on the curve to two other points is a constant. The two other points (represented here by the tack locations) are known as the foci of the ellipse. The closer together that these points are, the more closely that the ellipse resembles the shape of a circle. In fact, a circle is the special case of an ellipse in which the two foci are at the same location. Kepler's first law is rather simple - all planets orbit the sun in a path that resembles an ellipse, with the sun being located at one of the foci of that ellipse.

The Law of Equal Areas

Kepler's second law - sometimes referred to as the law of equal areas - describes the speed at which any given planet will move while orbiting the sun. The speed at which any planet moves through space is constantly changing. A planet moves fastest when it is closest to the sun and slowest when it is furthest from the sun. Yet, if an imaginary line were drawn from the center of the planet to the center of the sun, that line would sweep out the same area in equal periods of time. For instance, if an imaginary line were drawn from the earth to the sun, then the area swept out by the line in every 31-day month would be the same. This is depicted in the diagram below. As can be observed in the diagram, the areas formed when the earth is closest to the sun can be approximated as a wide but short triangle; whereas the areas formed when the earth is farthest from the sun can be approximated as a narrow but long triangle. These areas are the same size. Since the base of these triangles are shortest when the earth is farthest from the sun, the earth would have to be moving more slowly in order for this imaginary area to be the same size as when the earth is closest to the sun.

 

The Law of Harmonies

Kepler's third law - sometimes referred to as the law of harmonies - compares the orbital period and radius of orbit of a planet to those of other planets. Unlike Kepler's first and second laws that describe the motion characteristics of a single planet, the third law makes a comparison between the motion characteristics of different planets. The comparison being made is that the ratio of the squares of the periods to the cubes of their average distances from the sun is the same for every one of the planets. As an illustration, consider the orbital period and average distance from sun (orbital radius) for Earth and mars as given in the table below.
Planet
Period
(s)
Average
Distance (m)
T2/R3
(s2/m3)
Earth
3.156 x 107 s
1.4957 x 1011
2.977 x 10-19
Mars
5.93 x 107 s
2.278 x 1011
2.975 x 10-19

Observe that the T2/Rratio is the same for Earth as it is for mars. In fact, if the same T2/Rratio is computed for the other planets, it can be found that this ratio is nearly the same value for all the planets (see table below). Amazingly, every planet has the same T2/R3 ratio.
Planet
Period
(yr)
Average
Distance (au)
T2/R3
(yr2/au3)
Mercury
0.241
0.39
0.98
Venus
.615
0.72
1.01
Earth
1.00
1.00
1.00
Mars
1.88
1.52
1.01
Jupiter
11.8
5.20
0.99
Saturn
29.5
9.54
1.00
Uranus
84.0
19.18
1.00
Neptune
165
30.06
1.00
Pluto
248
39.44
1.00
(NOTE: The average distance value is given in astronomical units where 1 a.u. is equal to the distance from the earth to the sun - 1.4957 x 1011 m. The orbital period is given in units of earth-years where 1 earth year is the time required for the earth to orbit the sun - 3.156 x 107 seconds. )

Kepler's third law provides an accurate description of the period and distance for a planet's orbits about the sun. Additionally, the same law that describes the T2/R3 ratio for the planets' orbits about the sun also accurately describes the T2/R3 ratio for any satellite (whether a moon or a man-made satellite) about any planet. There is something much deeper to be found in this T2/R3 ratio - something that must relate to basic fundamental principles of motion. In the next part of Lesson 4, these principles will be investigated as we draw a connection between the circular motion principles discussed in Lesson 1 and the motion of a satellite.
 

How did Newton Extend His Notion of Gravity to Explain Planetary Motion?

Newton's comparison of the acceleration of the moon to the acceleration of objects on earth allowed him to establish that the moon is held in a circular orbit by the force of gravity - a force that is inversely dependent upon the distance between the two objects' centers. Establishing gravity as the cause of the moon's orbit does not necessarily establish that gravity is the cause of the planet's orbits. How then did Newton provide credible evidence that the force of gravity is meets the centripetal force requirement for the elliptical motion of planets?
Recall from earlier in Lesson 3 that Johannes Kepler proposed three laws of planetary motion. His Law of Harmonies suggested that the ratio of the period of orbit squared (T2) to the mean radius of orbit cubed (R3) is the same value k for all the planets that orbit the sun. Known data for the orbiting planets suggested the following average ratio:
k = 2.97 x 10-19 s2/m3 = (T2)/(R3)
Newton was able to combine the law of universal gravitation with circular motion principles to show that if the force of gravity provides the centripetal force for the planets' nearly circular orbits, then a value of 2.97 x 10-19 s2/mcould be predicted for the T2/Rratio. Here is the reasoning employed by Newton:
Consider a planet with mass Mplanet to orbit in nearly circular motion about the sun of mass MSun. The net centripetal force acting upon this orbiting planet is given by the relationship
Fnet = (Mplanet * v2) / R
This net centripetal force is the result of the gravitational force that attracts the planet towards the sun, and can be represented as
Fgrav = (G* Mplanet * MSun ) / R2
Since Fgrav = Fnet, the above expressions for centripetal force and gravitational force are equal. Thus,
(Mplanet * v2) / R = (G* Mplanet * MSun ) / R2
Since the velocity of an object in nearly circular orbit can be approximated as v = (2*pi*R) / T,
v2 = (4 * pi* R2) / T2
Substitution of the expression for v2 into the equation above yields,
(Mplanet * 4 * pi* R2) / (R • T2) = (G* Mplanet * MSun ) / R2
By cross-multiplication and simplification, the equation can be transformed into
T/ R= (Mplanet * 4 * pi2) / (G* Mplanet * MSun )
The mass of the planet can then be canceled from the numerator and the denominator of the equation's right-side, yielding
T/ R= (4 * pi2) / (G * MSun )
The right side of the above equation will be the same value for every planet regardless of the planet's mass. Subsequently, it is reasonable that the T2/R3 ratio would be the same value for all planets if the force that holds the planets in their orbits is the force of gravity. Newton's universal law of gravitation predicts results that were consistent with known planetary data and provided a theoretical explanation for Kepler's Law of Harmonies.


 

Investigate!

Scientists know much more about the planets than they did in Kepler's days. Use The Planetswidget bleow to explore what is known of the various planets.


 

Check Your Understanding

1. Our understanding of the elliptical motion of planets about the Sun spanned several years and included contributions from many scientists.

a. Which scientist is credited with the collection of the data necessary to support the planet's elliptical motion?
b. Which scientist is credited with the long and difficult task of analyzing the data?
c. Which scientist is credited with the accurate explanation of the data?

https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circles/Lesson-4/Kepler-s-Three-Laws



Foundations of Algebra



                                                                                                               

Distributive property explained

The distributive property tells us how to solve expressions in the form of a(b + c).  The distributive property is sometimes called the distributive law of multiplication and division.
Normally when we see an expression like this …
distributive property format
we just evaluate what’s in the parentheses first, then solve it:
distributive property in practice
This is following the official “order of operations” rule that we’ve learned in the past.
With the distributive property, we multiply the ‘4’ first:
distributing values
We distribute the 4 to the 8, then to the 3.
Then we need to remember to multiply first, before doing the addition!
We got the same answer, 44, with both approaches!
Why did we do it differently when we could have easily worked out what was in the brackets first? 
This is preparation for when we have variables instead of numbers inside the parentheses.
Another example before we start to use variables:
Example of the distributive property using variables:
More examples
a) 
b)
Tips
  • We usually use the distributive property because the two terms inside the parentheses can’t be added because they’re not like terms
  • Make sure you apply the outside number to all of the terms inside the parentheses/brackets
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/pre-algebra/pre-algebra-arith-prop/pre-algebra-ditributive-property/a/distributive-property-explained

Monday, August 20, 2018

Week of August 20, 2018

Astronomy

Answer to study guide:
https://msthomastro.weebly.com/

Foundations of Algebra

Here are the steps required for Multiplying Radicals With More Than One Term:

Step 1:Distribute (or FOIL) to remove the parenthesis. Remember that you can multiply numbers outside the radical with numbers outside the radical and numbers inside the radical with numbers inside the radical, assuming the radicals have the same index.
Step 2:Simplify the radicals. Click here to review the steps for Simplifying Radicals.
Step 3:Combine like terms. Remember that in order to add or subtract radicals the radicals must be exactly the same.
Example 1 – Multiply: Example 1
Step 1: Distribute (or FOIL) to remove the parenthesis. Remember that you can multiply numbers outside the radical with numbers outside the radical and numbers inside the radical with numbers inside the radical, assuming the radicals have the same index.
Step 1
Step 2: Simplify the radicals.
Step 2
Step 3: Combine like terms. Remember that in order to add or subtract radicals the radicals must be exactly the same. In this case, there are no like terms.
Step 3
Example 2 – Multiply: Example 2
Step 1: Distribute (or FOIL) to remove the parenthesis. Remember that you can multiply numbers outside the radical with numbers outside the radical and numbers inside the radical with numbers inside the radical, assuming the radicals have the same index.
Step 1
Step 2: Simplify the radicals.
Step 2
Step 3: Combine like terms. Remember that in order to add or subtract radicals the radicals must be exactly the same. In this case, there are no like terms.
Step 3
Example 3 – Multiply: Example 3
Step 1: Distribute (or FOIL) to remove the parenthesis. Remember that you can multiply numbers outside the radical with numbers outside the radical and numbers inside the radical with numbers inside the radical, assuming the radicals have the same index.
Step 1
Step 2: Simplify the radicals.
Step 2
Step 3: Combine like terms. Remember that in order to add or subtract radicals the radicals must be exactly the same.
Step 3
Example 4 – Multiply: Example 4
Step 1: Distribute (or FOIL) to remove the parenthesis. Remember that you can multiply numbers outside the radical with numbers outside the radical and numbers inside the radical with numbers inside the radical, assuming the radicals have the same index.
Step 1
Step 2: Simplify the radicals.
Step 2
Step 3: Combine like terms. Remember that in order to add or subtract radicals the radicals must be exactly the same.
Step 3
Example 5 – Multiply: Example 5
Step 1: Distribute (or FOIL) to remove the parenthesis. Remember that you can multiply numbers outside the radical with numbers outside the radical and numbers inside the radical with numbers inside the radical, assuming the radicals have the same index.
Step 1
Step 2: Simplify the radicals.
Step 2
Step 3: Combine like terms. Remember that in order to add or subtract radicals the radicals must be exactly the same.
Step 3
Example 6 – Multiply: Example 6
Step 1: Distribute (or FOIL) to remove the parenthesis. Remember that you can multiply numbers outside the radical with numbers outside the radical and numbers inside the radical with numbers inside the radical, assuming the radicals have the same index.
Step 1
Step 2: Simplify the radicals.
Step 2
Step 3: Combine like terms. Remember that in order to add or subtract radicals the radicals must be exactly the same.
Step 3

Source:http://www.mesacc.edu/~scotz47781/mat120/notes/radicals/multiplying/more_than_one_term/mult_rad_more_than_1.html